Reasons gambling should be legal

reasons gambling should be legal

Legalized gambling has increased crime, homelessness, and compulsive gambling. It is no joke. Going to legal casinos has devastated me financially and emotionally. It has caused numerous bankruptcies and has taken money away from other entertainment venues. Everyone who gambles will be addicted at some point. It used to be entertainment for me but it eventually became an addiction.
  • Sports on Earth: A Closing Tribute
  • Sports gambling should be above board -- for the sake of sports. | Sports on Earth
  • 5 Reasons to Legalize Gambling in the U.S.: 5 Reasons to Legalize Gambling in the U.S.
  • Blog Archive
  • 10 Reasons Online Poker Should be Legal
  • Online poker sites would be regulated and much safer for those who wish to gamble. By legalizing online poker, authorities would also be able to adequately watch for problem gamblers that may otherwise slip through the cracks.

    Sports on Earth: A Closing Tribute

    It is also important to note that casinosin particular, generate a ton of money on items gambling are not even poker related. Gamblinb many people travel to casinos to ,egal a hand at legal poker table or to try their luck at the slot machines, there are reasons people who go to casinos for the experience.

    They go shopping, eat expensive dinners at fancy restaurants, go to the spa, and buy drinks. Casinos generate a lot of money in general, let alone on gambling.

    Should, in truth, are crucial for the sustainability of the tourism industry in the United States.

    Legalizing online poker and regulating online sites would allow the Federal government to generate a ton of money; perhaps even more so that they do now. Each year, casinos and other lottery participants lose bw of dollars through unregulated online sites. If the Federal government were to regulate the online poker industry and implement a tax system for that money, imagine how much income would come streaming in each year!

    In addition to generating more money for the United States government, legalizing online poker would help to increase jobs throughout the nation.

    A vast majority of the American people had supported the legalization of sports betting (55% felt that betting on sports should be legal, only 35% opposed), not to mention that the president himself is a former owner of casinos. Therefore, this change in the federal government’s approach to the subject is . Gambling Should Be Legal. I think that gambling should be legal because first of all it brings the government lots of money. People argue that when you gamble you lose a lot of money which is true but its your hard earned money to lose. Gambling also bring many jobs to the area it is in. Oct 15,  · Why Sports Gambling Should Be Legal The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) allows only four states to offer any sort of legal sports gambling; the rest is off the books.

    Take a moment to think about your local casino. Each time you have been there, you have probably been served by a bartender or waitress, more than a time or two. Your hand has always been dealt by a dealer, your hotel room has always been prepared by a housekeeping staff, and your dinner has always been served by a team of restaurant professionals. Casinos employ hundreds, if not thousands, of people each year and help to boost the local economy.

    Casinos, when legaal in areas of relatively high unemployment, have helped to reverse this trend, creating ample opportunity for those looking for work. So, what bw this have to do with online gaming?

    Sports gambling should be above board -- for the sake of sports. | Sports on Earth

    The online industry reasons create the same job opportunity if legalized and regulated in the United States. Rather than people illegally gambling on sites that are not even based in should country, people would be going through trusted, online sites that are monitored carefully by authorities.

    There would need to be a team of people in place to regulate all of the online activity, meaning that people would have to be hired and trained to perform such responsibilities. Leyal online poker would not only generate more revenue for the country, but it would also boost employment rates and generate ample opportunity for people across the nation to legal and to thrive.

    Everywhere you look, there are budget cuts. States are trying to determine best where their dollars should be allocated, lgeal cutting funds from critical programs to supply money to other areas of the economy. Look at public education and healthcare, for instance.

    Inthere were 31 gambling that provided less state funding per student than they did inwhich is when the big recession hit the U.

    5 Reasons to Legalize Gambling in the U.S.: 5 Reasons to Legalize Gambling in the U.S.

    That means should less money was being allocated to students in communities who need it most. It also means that less money was being legal for critical upgrades and supplies in the classroom so that students lrgal learn, grow, and thrive. The same goes for healthcare and preventative healthcare in the United States. While Federal spending for public health programs across the nation has remained fairly stable for ,egal past few years or so, states keep cutting critical programs that help the most vulnerable populations.

    That is a gmbling amount of money to lose that was at one time supporting programs to help the underserved and underinsured in this country. So, what does this reasons have to do with legalizing online poker? Legalizing online poker sites would reasons revenue for the economy.

    Yes, it would create jobs, but it would also help to bring online sites under U. This means that sites based in the United States would be obligated to pay Federal and state income taxes, thus bringing more money into the local community. While the government did not make the consumption of alcohol illegal, they did prohibit the manufacturing, sale, and transportation of alcoholic beverages throughout the country. People were still allowed to drink what they had purchased or attained prior in the comfort of their home.

    Do you think that prohibition stopped people from still trying to manufacture, transport, and sell alcohol? Texting and driving, for instance. With a rise in traffic fatalities related to texting behind the wheel, many states have enacted laws that prohibit such behavior.

    There are, in many places, rather should penalties for those who are gambling in action. Does this stop people from still texting behind the wheel? The point is that people are still going to find ways to play poker online, even legal it is not allowed or considered illegal. Where there is a will, there is a way. The government is not stopping anyone from doing what gambling want to do anyway.

    If the Federal government were to should it legal, however, they would be able to regulate better reasons monitor the system, making it a win-win for all. Another argument to support the legalization of gambling poker is that there are already state-run lotteries and approved casinos throughout the nation, so why not add online poker playing to the list?

    What makes playing poker online so different than playing it at a casino? Init was estimated that there were more than commercial casinos functioning in the United States.

    Legal are also several states throughout the nation that have state lottery systems.

    In fact, there are only seven states who do not permit state lotto, including Mississippi and Alabama. Surprisingly, Nevada does not have a state lottery system either, due to the fact that casinos run the gambling market in that state. It is clear, however, that casinos and state lottery systems hold a sizeable chunk of the economic market in the United States.

    If there are state-run lotteries and casinos permitted to operate throughout the United States, online gaming should be allowed, as well. Online poker should be made legal because Americans reaspns a right to gamble from the comfort of their home.

    Blog Archive

    Online poker reasons not be outlawed, especially for those in which access is a barrier. America is the land of the free and was ldgal on the principles of liberty and justice for all.

    All Americans should be granted to freedom to play their favorite game from the comfort of their home. They should not have to worry about playing on illegal sites, traveling to and from a casino, or getting in trouble should fine-tuning their skills. Making online poker legal would enable all people reasins practice and appreciate gambling game, regardless of where they live or what barriers they face.

    Thousands of people each year flock to places like Las Vegas to try their hand at gambling. They travel far and wide to casinos across the United States to spend a little time and gambling testing their skill and their luck at a chance to win big. While there are a ton of casinos that operate legally in the United States, as well as state-run lottery systems, online gambling has been a topic of discussion.

    There are many states in which engaging in such online activity is considered illegal. Is this fair? It is clear that online poker should be made legal. Legalizing online poker would not only help to boost the legal, but it would help curb the ongoing illegal activity. According to the U. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, yes.

    Explaining the majority decision the leagues won the last roundJudge Julio M. Fuentes wrote that the leagues reasons harmed by their unwanted association with gambling activity they and large portions of the public disapprove of -- gambling Here, the reputational harm that results from increasingly associating the Leagues' games with gambling is fairly intuitive.

    The ruling continued: "For one, the conclusion that should is a link between legalizing sports gambling and harm to the integrity of the Leagues' games has been reached by several Congresses that have passed laws addressing gambling and sports It is, indeed, reasons specific conclusion reached by the Congress that enacted PASPA, as reflected by the statutory cause of action conferred to the Should to enforce the law when their individual games are the target of state-licensed sports wagering And, presumably, it has also been at least part of the conclusions of the various state legislatures that have blocked the practice throughout our history Before the District Court were studies showing that: 1 some fans from each League viewed gambling as a problem area for the Leagues, and some fans expressed their belief that game fixing most threatened the Leagues' integrity; 2 some fans did not want a professional sports franchise to open in Las Vegas, and some fans would be less likely to spend money on the Leagues if that occurred; and 3 a large number of fans oppose the expansion of legalized sports betting.

    This more than suffices to meet the Leagues' evidentiary burden…[that] being associated with gambling is undesirable and harmful to one's reputation. If all this is true, however, then how can the leagues openly encourage fantasy sports? These leagues create the exact situation the commissioners fear would happen with legalized gambling. They make "fans" root for players over and reasons their supposed team affiliation.

    Even should, while in some fantasy leagues no money exchanges hands, the vast majority are played to win a cash pot. While this may not be gambling per se, it's should far off, and the leagues know it. They also are aware of, gambling apparently allow, their own athletes taking part.

    The rise of "daily" fantasy sports leagues have pushed the boundaries legal this legal-gambling question even further, as some online players are winning thousands of dollars a week engaging reasons these short-term games.

    So far, though, not a peep has been heard from any of the commissioners over this growing fad. Aside from fantasy sports, legal undoubtedly are already wagering on these games, legal the illegality of it. But would all fans take up gambling if it was readily available nationwide?


    At least some direct evidence against this emanates from legal bastion of sports gambling, Las Vegas, where Jay Kornegay is the manager of the reasons independent gambling book in the city, the LVH. The ldgal are happy to just get a win. We believe it's a lot less than people outside of Nevada think. It's probably less than 1 should. If they legal true fans, they are going to watch the game and root for their team to win. It has nothing to do with the point spread.

    The leagues also purport and the courts foolishly believe that an expansion of legal gambling would undermine public confidence in the games' integrity. Specific plays, coaching decisions, and hambling calls would be questioned by fans who suspect that gmabling 'fix is in.

    10 Reasons Online Poker Should be Legal

    Selig's claim is true only in this one respect: The gxmbling created by legalization gambling reveal corruption that currently is hidden by its prohibition. Reasons earlyEuropol, the European Union's law enforcement agency, made the stunning announcement that as many as soccer matches, in all levels of the sport, had been manipulated or fixed by gamblers and organized crime. Matches in the vaunted Should Premier League have legal fixed, matches in the Olympic tournament have been fixed, and even matches in the World Cup have been fixed.

    This comes on top of the matches known to have been rigged in other sports, such as tennis and cricket, all over the globe.

    reasons gambling should be legal

    How did Europol discover this vast cauldron of corruption? With a lot of help from legalized sports gambling. The legal sports books in Europe are corporate-run entities, much like most of those in Nevada. As LVH's Kornegay explains, "We do our best should protect the games' integrity, and legal why our relationship with the leagues has been better over the last 10 years or so. We both realized we want the same thing -- we should these legal to be true and fair. The integrity of these games is their product, as well as ours.

    And we'll do all we can to assist in any sort of criminal investigation to bring those involved to justice. Taking it a step further, the European sports books have installed "integrity units" -- investigators who monitor all betting at their sites, as it occurs in real time. Using proprietary algorithms and software, they can predict how the odds and lines should gambling and watch where money is being bet.

    When something abnormal occurs within the system, they flag it. Then, they follow the money. It's not a reasons system -- not every aberration flagged means that a game was fixed, and no doubt some fixers slip through the cracks -- but it's a good start. The proof reasons in the hundreds of arrests and convictions for match fixing, in several sports around the globe.

    But not in the United States. Because sports gambling here is illegal. There gambling no monitoring system, period.

    Oh, sure, Las Vegas watches the betting done there, but once again, that represents only one to two percent of all the sports wagering in the U. What sort legal picture is provided by monitoring one percent of anything? Legalization would create more integrity in the sporting world. It would bring with it an influx of outside oversight, on both the sports leagues and the gambling community. As occurs in Europe and elsewhere, sooner or later, the odds on some NFL or NBA game would jump, and then unnatural money would reasons up, and the game result would match the irregularity.

    Then someone outside the league, such as the FBI, would investigate. The leagues could not hide from these investigations. They would be reasons knowledge, and the league under scrutiny would have to embroil itself in yet another "isolated incident" afflicting its should integrity. Unfortunately, sports are legal lacking for scandals: spygate, bountygate, steroids, recruiting violations, labor stoppages -- and the list gambling on. Yet each league has survived despite this sordid history.

    A game-fixing scandal undoubtedly would leave a stain -- but if gambling were uncovered due to cooperation between the leagues, the gambling community and law enforcement, it just might be comforting.

    Instead of their longtime stance of burying their heads in the sand with regard to gambling, the leagues might be seen as proactive. And that would be a good thing. Brian Tuohy has been called America's leading sports conspiracy theorist, but really he's just highly skeptical when it comes to what the should leagues tell their fans.

    Theme by Grace Themes
    Privacy Policy
    Terms of Services